From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas |
Date: | 2012-05-30 09:06:20 |
Message-ID: | 20120530.180620.600165924826262795.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> Yeah, Jeff's experiments indicated that the remaining bottleneck is lock
> management in the server. What I fixed so far on the pg_dump side
> should be enough to let partial dumps run at reasonable speed even if
> the whole database contains many tables. But if psql is taking
> AccessShareLock on lots of tables, there's still a problem.
Ok, I modified the part of pg_dump where tremendous number of LOCK
TABLE are issued. I replace them with single LOCK TABLE with multiple
tables. With 100k tables LOCK statements took 13 minutes in total, now
it only takes 3 seconds. Comments?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_dump.diff | text/x-patch | 1.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2012-05-30 09:32:42 | Re: Bug in new buffering GiST build code |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-05-30 09:01:51 | Re: Bug in new buffering GiST build code |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Murat Tasan | 2012-05-30 17:57:43 | does the query planner consider work_mem? |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2012-05-30 00:58:16 | Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas |