From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Draft release notes complete |
Date: | 2012-05-24 23:11:20 |
Message-ID: | 20120524231120.GO10306@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:16:28PM +0100, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 24 May 2012 22:57, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > OK, item moved down. We have not have "bug fix" designation. You have
> > a suggestion?
>
> I assumed you were going to put it beside the other compatibility note
> relating to pg_stat_statements, "Change pg_stat_statements' total_time
> column to be measured in milliseconds (Tom Lane)".
>
> The "Improve pg_stat_statements' handling of PREPARE/EXECUTE
> statements" is just a way of preventing SQL PREPARE and EXECUTE
> utility statements from being double counted in various ways as both
> utility statements and optimisable statements. No one actually noticed
> this before, and it wouldn't have been feasible to fix in back
> branches, I think. Here are the relevant comments:
>
> * If it's an EXECUTE statement, we don't track it and don't increment
> * the nesting level. This allows the cycles to be charged to the
> * underlying PREPARE instead (by the Executor hooks), which is much more
> * useful.
> *
> * We also don't track execution of PREPARE. If we did, we would get one
> * hash table entry for the PREPARE (with hash calculated from the query
> * string), and then a different one with the same query string (but hash
> * calculated from the query tree) would be used to accumulate costs of
> * ensuing EXECUTEs. This would be confusing, and inconsistent with other
> * cases where planning time is not included at all.
OK, I updated the wording on this, but don't see it as something
incompatibile, in the same way that the others listed are incompatible.
>
> Also, as I've said, this I/O timings thing certainly deserves to be
> separately listed as a new pg_stat_statements feature:
>
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=5b4f346611431361339253203d486789e4babb02
OK, I merged that into the existing item. Applied patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_stat_statements.diff | text/x-diff | 1.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sergey Koposov | 2012-05-24 23:26:28 | Re: 9.2beta1, parallel queries, ReleasePredicateLocks, CheckForSerializableConflictIn in the oprofile |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-05-24 23:10:43 | Re: 9.2beta1, parallel queries, ReleasePredicateLocks, CheckForSerializableConflictIn in the oprofile |