From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Rajesh Kumar(dot) Mallah" <mallah(at)tradeindia(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: High load average in 64-core server , no I/O wait and CPU is idle |
Date: | 2012-05-24 15:57:37 |
Message-ID: | 20120524155737.GP1267@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Rajesh,
* Rajesh Kumar. Mallah (mallah(at)tradeindia(dot)com) wrote:
> We are puzzled why the CPU and DISK I/O system are not being utilized
> fully and would seek lists' wisdom on that.
What OS is this? What kernel version?
> just a thought, will it be a good idea to partition the host hardware
> to 4 equal virtual environments , ie 1 for master (r/w) and 3 slaves r/o
> and distribute the r/o load on the 3 slaves ?
Actually, it might help with 9.1, if you're really running into some
scalability issues in our locking area.. You might review this:
http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2012/04/did-i-say-32-cores-how-about-64.html
That's a pretty contrived test case, but I suppose it's possible your
case is actually close enough to be getting affected also..
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajesh Kumar. Mallah | 2012-05-24 16:40:26 | Re: High load average in 64-core server , no I/O wait and CPU is idle |
Previous Message | Steve Crawford | 2012-05-24 15:53:47 | Re: High load average in 64-core server , no I/O wait and CPU is idle |