| From: | David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | haproxy / pgpool / rhcs |
| Date: | 2012-05-22 16:36:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20120522163613.GA8702@mr-paradox.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello
I'm implementing HA/failover for my PG nodes. I'm using PG9.0 and async replication and linux.
Typical problem - if node 1 fails I want the mirror to become active and take over for the master.
The solution should be able to initiate the failover of the standby and start re-directing traffic it.
I've spent a lot of time looking at PgPool so I'm well aware that it's perfectly capable of this.
However, it feels a little bit like overkill since i don't want it's pooler and I'm not load
balancing.
The other option would be RHCS, which I know will work, but to implement it with pg replication
is a little hacky.
So, I'm considering HAProxy, does anyone have experience with that for managing HA, good or bad?
Thanks.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alan Hodgson | 2012-05-22 16:53:47 | Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9? |
| Previous Message | Poul Møller Hansen | 2012-05-22 15:11:13 | Re: Why are pg_restore taking that long ? |