From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | zeljko <zeljko(at)holobit(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Libpq question |
Date: | 2012-05-20 13:53:54 |
Message-ID: | 20120520135354.GB20754@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 02:51:42PM +0200, zeljko wrote:
> John Townsend wrote:
>
> > It appears that some developers (Davart) are by-passing the standard
> > client library, ???libpq.dll???, and directly accessing the server using
> > Delphi or FPC. I am not sure of the advantage here. All libpq.dll
>
> I'm FPC user and I use libpq.so(.dll,.dylib) via zeoslib.
> Those who bypass libpq probably uses odbc connections or similar.
The PostgreSQL-ODBC drivers that I know of use libpq as well.
There are other implementations of of the libpq protocol, the Java lib
being the major one. There are pure perl/python implementations but
AFAIK they are not widely used.
It's not common to not use libpq.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he does
> not attach much importance to his own thoughts.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-20 15:33:16 | Re: IN vs equality (was Re: odd intermittent query hanging issue) |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2012-05-20 13:51:03 | Re: Locking or Something Else? |