Re: Libpq question

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: zeljko <zeljko(at)holobit(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Libpq question
Date: 2012-05-20 13:53:54
Message-ID: 20120520135354.GB20754@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 02:51:42PM +0200, zeljko wrote:
> John Townsend wrote:
>
> > It appears that some developers (Davart) are by-passing the standard
> > client library, ???libpq.dll???, and directly accessing the server using
> > Delphi or FPC. I am not sure of the advantage here. All libpq.dll
>
> I'm FPC user and I use libpq.so(.dll,.dylib) via zeoslib.
> Those who bypass libpq probably uses odbc connections or similar.

The PostgreSQL-ODBC drivers that I know of use libpq as well.

There are other implementations of of the libpq protocol, the Java lib
being the major one. There are pure perl/python implementations but
AFAIK they are not widely used.

It's not common to not use libpq.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he does
> not attach much importance to his own thoughts.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-05-20 15:33:16 Re: IN vs equality (was Re: odd intermittent query hanging issue)
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2012-05-20 13:51:03 Re: Locking or Something Else?