From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Update comments for PGPROC/PGXACT split |
Date: | 2012-05-13 20:52:31 |
Message-ID: | 20120513205231.GB23040@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Many comment references to PGPROC and MyProc should now refer to PGXACT and
MyPgXact. This patch attempts to cover all such cases. In some places, a
comment refers collectively to all the xid-related fields, which span both
structures. I variously changed those to refer to either or both structures
depending on how I judged the emphasis.
The PGXACT patch extracted the PGPROC struct formerly embedded in each
GlobalTransaction. I updated a few comments accordingly.
The procarray.c leading comment described the procarray as "unsorted", but it
is sorted by memory address; I removed that word.
I include two typo-only fixes on related but already-accurate lines.
Thanks,
nm
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgxact-comments-v1.patch | text/plain | 35.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-05-13 22:45:26 | Re: Exclusion Constraints on Arrays? |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2012-05-13 20:44:07 | Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication |