Re: Draft release notes complete

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete
Date: 2012-05-10 15:54:34
Message-ID: 20120510155434.GP16881@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:46:20AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>I don't think 5 minutes is anywhere near necessary even for the docs,
> >>but there is a lot of room between 5 minutes and 4 hours, so we can
> >>definitely shorten it.
> >Do you want me to just setup a build on my machine like we did before;
> >5 minutes is no problem for me.
> >
> >I use the doc build to show patch submitters what their final work looks
> >like, and anything more than a few minutes delay makes that useless.
> >
>
> It's been done the current way for quite a few months now. If you're
> only noticing it now is it really such an inconvenience? Having said
> that, I'm not at all opposed to reducing the lag time.

Well, I am not applying doc patches much anymore; my point is that the
first time I actually need to send out a URL of the docs, it wasn't
sufficient for me.

Yes, I can work around it, but it that what we want everyone to do? I
don't remember this change being discussed anywhere I see.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-05-10 15:54:36 Re: Draft release notes complete
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-05-10 15:46:20 Re: Draft release notes complete