| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
| Date: | 2012-04-11 01:32:05 |
| Message-ID: | 201204110332.05789.andres@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 03:14:41 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> > I'm somewhat oddly pleased at how the overflow of incoming submissions
> > for 9.2 has raised questions around not having enough active committers.
> > I hope decisions about adding more recognizes that distributing that
> > power really does influence the ability of people to contribute, on
> > average in a positive way. All I see coming for next year is a dramatic
> > increase in this class of problem.
>
> My perception of what's going on here is dramatically different from
> yours. I don't think there was any overflow of submissions for 9.2.
> For the most part I would describe it as a slow and boring release
> cycle, with the usual spike in half-baked submissions right near the
> end, except this release they were less baked than usual, which is why
> most of them didn't go in.
They might have been half-baked. But several of those didn't get design-level
review for several weeks which makes it rather hard to fully bake them in
time...
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-04-11 01:33:35 | Re: Last gasp |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2012-04-11 01:30:20 | Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results |