From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Claes Jakobsson <claes(at)versed(dot)se>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012 |
Date: | 2012-04-09 19:21:36 |
Message-ID: | 20120409192136.GE3379@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 01:29:46PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> but generally speaking jdbc is displacing odbc as the 'go to' library
> for connection between different kinds of database systems, especially
> on non-windows environments. jdbc is to java as fdw is to postgres
> basically. so a fdw exposed jdbc driver should be able to connect and
> gather data from just about anything -- even something like sql server
> so that you could bypass the freetds dependency which is quite nice.
Yes, I can see jdbc-fdw being very powerful.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-04-09 19:23:15 | Re: Revisiting extract(epoch from timestamp) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-09 18:42:24 | Re: bug in fast-path locking |