Re: Command Triggers, v16

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, v16
Date: 2012-03-16 08:45:15
Message-ID: 201203160945.15661.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday, March 16, 2012 09:30:58 AM Thom Brown wrote:
> On 16 March 2012 08:13, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 15, 2012 11:41:21 PM Thom Brown wrote:
> >> Looks like the ctas-on-command-triggers-01.patch patch needs re-basing.
> >
> > I can do that - but imo the other patch (not based on the command
> > triggers stuff) is the relevant for now as this patch ought to be
> > applied before command triggers. It doesn't seem to make too much sense
> > to rebase it frequently as long as the command triggers patch isn't
> > stable...
> >
> > Any reason you would prefer it being rebased?
>
> Using latest Git master without any additional patches, I can't get it to
> apply:
>
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 16.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 22 (offset -1 lines).
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> src/include/commands/tablecmds.h.rej
Did you read the paragraph above?

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2012-03-16 08:48:49 Re: Command Triggers, v16
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2012-03-16 08:44:25 Proposal: Create index on foreign table