Re: Rules of Thumb for Autovaccum

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert James <srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rules of Thumb for Autovaccum
Date: 2012-02-15 14:28:02
Message-ID: 20120215142802.GA13010@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 09:14:34AM -0500, Robert James wrote:
> What rules of thumb exist for:
> * How often a table needs to be vacuumed?
> * How often a table needs to be analyzed?
> * How to tune Autovacuum?
>
> I have a large DB server, and I'm concerned that it's not being
> autovaccumed and autoanalyzed frequently enough. But I have no idea
> what proper values should be?
>
> A related question: If I INSERT a large number of records per day,
> similar in nature to the existing records, does that require new
> vacuum? new analyze? Or do I only need those for DELETEs or changes to
> the nature of records?
>
> Finally: What type of performance impact can I expect from vacuum and
> analyze, in general?

Unless you are very high-volume, the auto-vacuum default settings are
fine. The default do allow up to 20% of unused space in tables, but
making that lower is expensive to performance.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2012-02-15 14:31:45 Re: Memory tuning Postgres
Previous Message Robert James 2012-02-15 14:20:06 Memory tuning Postgres