From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Venkat Balaji <venkat(dot)balaji(at)verse(dot)in> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERA]: Postgresql-9.1.1 synchronous replication issue |
Date: | 2012-02-14 14:39:03 |
Message-ID: | 201202140639.04279.adrian.klaver@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:21:22 am Venkat Balaji wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Disaster Recovery testing for Synchronous replication setup -
>
> When the standby site is down, transactions at the production site started
> hanging (this is after the successful setup of synchronous replication).
>
> We changed synchronous_commit to 'local' to over-come this situation.
>
> - No transactions are hanging at the production site even when the standby
> is down
> - Standby is automatically getting synced when it is back up again.
>
> Can someone let us know if there are any "-ve" effects of putting
> synchronous_commit='local' ??
>
> I am assuming that this as good as putting "synchronous_commit=on" on an
> stand-alone system.
It would seem you are really after streaming replication(which is asynchronous)
more than synchronous replication. I have not used synchronous replication
enough to be sure, but I think by setting synchronous_commit='local' you are
basically turning the system into a straight streaming(asynchronous) system
anyway.
>
> We need to get this setup live on production shortly.
>
> Thanks
> VB
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2012-02-14 19:12:11 | Re: Database denormalization |
Previous Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2012-02-14 14:06:15 | Re: Let-bindings in SQL statements |