Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?!

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?!
Date: 2012-01-30 17:45:09
Message-ID: 20120130174509.GA27119@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:43:46AM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 09:23 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
>
> >
> >I think I explained it in previous mails, and if not - sorry, but
> >I clearly can't explain good enough - the point is that with the way how
> >extensions now work, they are useless for providing way to create
> >tables that will store data, in case you would ever want dump without
> >this data.
>
> So in summary; if an extension creates a user table you want access
> to that table(schema and data) via pg_dump, outside the extension
> mechanism, without resorting to marking it as a configuration table.
> Is that correct ?

no.
I want to be able to do both:
1. dump the data for the table
2. dump structure of other tables
but not in the same file.

Best regards,

depesz

--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scot Kreienkamp 2012-01-30 17:48:56 list blocking queries
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2012-01-30 17:43:46 Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?!

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2012-01-30 17:51:58 Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?!
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2012-01-30 17:43:46 Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?!