From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?! |
Date: | 2012-01-30 17:45:09 |
Message-ID: | 20120130174509.GA27119@depesz.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:43:46AM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 09:23 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
>
> >
> >I think I explained it in previous mails, and if not - sorry, but
> >I clearly can't explain good enough - the point is that with the way how
> >extensions now work, they are useless for providing way to create
> >tables that will store data, in case you would ever want dump without
> >this data.
>
> So in summary; if an extension creates a user table you want access
> to that table(schema and data) via pg_dump, outside the extension
> mechanism, without resorting to marking it as a configuration table.
> Is that correct ?
no.
I want to be able to do both:
1. dump the data for the table
2. dump structure of other tables
but not in the same file.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scot Kreienkamp | 2012-01-30 17:48:56 | list blocking queries |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-30 17:43:46 | Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-30 17:51:58 | Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?! |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-30 17:43:46 | Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?! |