Re: random_page_cost vs seq_page_cost

From:	Benedikt Grundmann <bgrundmann(at)janestreet(dot)com>
To:	Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: random_page_cost vs seq_page_cost
Date:	2012-01-11 08:29:02
Message-ID:	20120111082902.GW6419@ldn-qws-004.delacy.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2012-01-05 10:04:05 from Benedikt Grundmann <bgrundmann(at)janestreet(dot)com>  2012-01-05 14:32:30 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>  2012-01-05 14:34:27 from Benedikt Grundmann <bgrundmann(at)janestreet(dot)com>  2012-01-05 23:00:47 from Jeremy Harris <jgh(at)wizmail(dot)org>   2012-01-06 00:17:20 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>  2012-01-07 21:01:26 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>   2012-01-09 16:05:46 from Benedikt Grundmann <bgrundmann(at)janestreet(dot)com>  2012-01-10 20:22:41 from Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>   2012-01-11 08:26:52 from Benedikt Grundmann <bgrundmann(at)janestreet(dot)com>    2012-01-11 08:29:02 from Benedikt Grundmann <bgrundmann(at)janestreet(dot)com>    2012-02-07 20:23:47 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> 📎     2012-02-07 22:06:18 from Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>      2012-02-08 00:58:28 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>       2012-02-08 09:28:49 from Benedikt Grundmann <bgrundmann(at)janestreet(dot)com>       2012-02-12 00:53:25 from Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>        2012-02-13 02:04:28 from Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>       2012-02-14 21:52:33 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>      2012-02-12 00:49:27 from Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: random_page_cost vs seq_page_cost at 2012-01-11 08:26:52 from Benedikt Grundmann

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Simon Riggs	2012-01-11 09:09:38	Re: Sending notifications from the master to the standby
Previous Message	Benedikt Grundmann	2012-01-11 08:26:52	Re: random_page_cost vs seq_page_cost