Re: [RFC] grants vs. inherited tables

From: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] grants vs. inherited tables
Date: 2011-12-30 09:25:43
Message-ID: 20111230092543.GA3045@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:11:22PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Marko Kreen's message of jue dic 29 15:22:49 -0300 2011:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 03:12:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Marko Kreen's message of jue dic 29 15:04:49 -0300 2011:
> > > > 3) Have a way to format aclitem into something
> > > > that can used to create GRANT statement easily. Eg:
> > > >
> > > > pg_get_privilege_info(
> > > > IN priv aclitem,
> > > > OUT rolename text,
> > > > OUT privlist text[],
> > > > OUT privlist_with_grant_option text[]);
> > > >
> > > > This allows doing complex introspection in pl/pgsql
> > > > and also helps tools that want to re-create table structure
> > > > in other databases.
> > >
> > > aclexplode?
> >
> > I guess that decides the name. :)
>
> I have the (hopefully wrong) impression that you're missing the fact
> that it already exists, at least in 9.0.

You are right, I missed it. For quite obvious reason:

$ grep -ri aclexplode doc/
$

Is there a good reason why it's undocumented? Internal/unstable API?
I better avoid it then. But I would like to have this or similar
function as part of public API.

Although this hints also to an obvious area that I shouldn't
have missed - the grants can be seen from information_schema...

I guess the 3) is covered then.

--
marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-12-30 12:15:02 Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Previous Message Jean-Yves F. Barbier 2011-12-30 06:34:28 Re: index refuses to build [finally SOLVED, but still some questions]