From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Greg Donald <gdonald(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 9.1 pg_dump setval() sets wrong value |
Date: | 2011-12-28 15:30:29 |
Message-ID: | 201112280730.29932.adrian.klaver@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 7:18:01 am Greg Donald wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> > So how are the sequences being tied to the tables? In your previous post
> > the table definitions did not show a SERIAL type or a default of
> > nextval().
>
> The id columns were created using "id serial NOT NULL".
>
> I've gone back this morning and pulled older backups, from when I was
> using pg_dump that came with my PostgreSQL 8.4 install. Those backups
> look fine to me, all the setval() calls are there and correct. So it
> looks like a problem with the new pg_dump best I can tell.
Wonder if it is related to this:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-11/msg00098.php
Might want to file bug report:
http://www.postgresql.org/support/submitbug/
In the meantime what about using 8.4 pg_dump to create dump file and then using
that file to load 9.1 server.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Donald | 2011-12-28 15:51:24 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.1 pg_dump setval() sets wrong value |
Previous Message | Greg Donald | 2011-12-28 15:18:01 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.1 pg_dump setval() sets wrong value |