From: | Jan-Peter(dot)Seifert(at)gmx(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | lst_hoe02(at)kwsoft(dot)de, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Number of connections still limited on Windows 64-bit? |
Date: | 2011-12-13 16:15:50 |
Message-ID: | 20111213161550.219250@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hello Andreas,
thank you very much for the link.
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:04:30 +0100
> Von: lst_hoe02(at)kwsoft(dot)de
> Zitat von Jan-Peter Seifert <Jan-Peter(dot)Seifert(at)gmx(dot)de>:
> > I wonder whether the number of connections is still limited on
> > Windows 64-bit if you also use a 64-bit version of PostgreSQL:
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947246/en-us
So the default setting for Windows 7 64-Bit seems to be:
SharedSection=1024,20480,768
Makes me wonder whether PostgreSQL ( as a service ) still uses the 'Non-interactive desktop heap' for connections then.
I used pgbench for testing 500 connections ( max_connections set to 600 ):
Initialize:
pgbench -i -U postgres -h host -p port
Test:
pgbench -U postgres -h host -p port -c 500
Verify:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM pg_stat_activity;
The non-interactive Desktop Heap has been increased by just a half - yet the number of connections can obviously be much higher than 200. I guess the connections don't need less memory now though.
Do the services share the same desktop (heap) or does each (PostgreSQL) service has its own ( if I register each service for a different Windows user?).
Thank you very much,
Peter
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Matthew Cook | 2011-12-13 17:39:55 | PostgreSQL Schema Standards Tool |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-12-13 16:12:37 | Re: Creating Multiple Instance |