Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?

From: Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?
Date: 2011-12-08 17:00:23
Message-ID: 20111208180023.1b40a14e@marco-dalibo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Le Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:27:56 +0000,
"Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com> a écrit :

> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > I wish it was the same (I use and like both pgbouncer and pgpool
> > too, and they do a good job, I'm not arguing on that). But
> > unfortunately it isn't: you still have the notion of session for
> > each connected client in Oracle when using the shared servers model.
> >
> > It means you keep your session variables, your prepared statements,
> > your running transaction, etc… in each individual session while
> > having the multiplexing equivalent of a 'statement level' from
> > pgbouncer.
>
> In Oracle - can the pool share connections between DB users and/or
> databases on the instance? If the answer is yes to either, that is a
> fair bit better than what we can achieve today.

Between users yes. But there is only one DB per instance in Oracle :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2011-12-08 17:02:51 Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2011-12-08 16:56:39 Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?