From: | Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |
Date: | 2011-12-08 17:00:23 |
Message-ID: | 20111208180023.1b40a14e@marco-dalibo |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Le Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:27:56 +0000,
"Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com> a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > I wish it was the same (I use and like both pgbouncer and pgpool
> > too, and they do a good job, I'm not arguing on that). But
> > unfortunately it isn't: you still have the notion of session for
> > each connected client in Oracle when using the shared servers model.
> >
> > It means you keep your session variables, your prepared statements,
> > your running transaction, etc… in each individual session while
> > having the multiplexing equivalent of a 'statement level' from
> > pgbouncer.
>
> In Oracle - can the pool share connections between DB users and/or
> databases on the instance? If the answer is yes to either, that is a
> fair bit better than what we can achieve today.
Between users yes. But there is only one DB per instance in Oracle :)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-12-08 17:02:51 | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-12-08 16:56:39 | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |