Re: xpath_table

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "magtiki2(at)juno(dot)com" <magtiki2(at)juno(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: xpath_table
Date: 2011-11-25 21:01:20
Message-ID: 201111252101.pAPL1KG15165@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:19 PM, magtiki2(at)juno(dot)com <magtiki2(at)juno(dot)com> wrote:
> > I noticed in the Postgres 9.1 manual that the xml2 module has been removed.
>
> No, it hasn't. We talked about it, but we didn't do it. We're still
> "planning" to remove it three releases ago.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/xml2.html

The hold-up has been that the built-in xml type still does not do
everything the old xml2 module did. I don't remember the details.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-11-25 21:24:50 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2011-11-25 20:53:19 Re: Inserting heap tuples in bulk in COPY