Re: plpgsql Difference in behaviour between versions?

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql(dot)general(at)googlegroups(dot)com
Subject: Re: plpgsql Difference in behaviour between versions?
Date: 2011-11-24 01:19:07
Message-ID: 201111231719.07954.adrian.klaver@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 11:43:04 am Chris McDonald wrote:
> OK, I see it is the term open which fails the syntax checker - I guessed
> this might be because open is a reserved word but
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/sql-keywords-appendix.html
> does not indicate whether open is either reserved or not in postgresql.

The relevant part from above is:

"As a general rule, if you get spurious parser errors for commands that contain
any of the listed key words as an identifier you should try to quote the
identifier to see if the problem goes away. "

>

> Still interested in a definitive answer, but the fix for me appears to be
> simply to change the word open to something else.

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phoenix Kiula 2011-11-24 01:31:10 Re: Installed. Now what?
Previous Message Phoenix Kiula 2011-11-24 01:18:31 Re: Installed. Now what?