Re: SSD options, small database, ZFS

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSD options, small database, ZFS
Date: 2011-11-22 18:10:29
Message-ID: 201111221810.pAMIATK15156@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Greg Smith wrote:
> The whole memorys speed topic is also much more complicated than any
> simple explanation can cover. How many banks of RAM you can use
> effectively changes based on the number of CPUs and associated chipset
> too. Someone just sent me an explanation recently of why I was seeing
> some strange things on my stream-scaling benchmark program. That dove
> into a bunch of trivia around how the RAM is actually accessed on the
> motherboard. One of the reasons I keep so many samples on that
> program's page is to help people navigate this whole maze, and have some
> data points to set expectations against. See
> https://github.com/gregs1104/stream-scaling for the code and the samples.

I can confirm that a Xeon E5620 CPU wants memory to be in multiples of
3, and a dual-CPU 5620 system needs memory in multiples of 6. (I
installed 12 2GB modules.)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-11-22 18:11:31 Re: SSD options, small database, ZFS
Previous Message Edgardo Portal 2011-11-22 16:59:17 Re: SSD endurance calculations