From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Rename a database that has connections |
Date: | 2011-11-22 03:38:35 |
Message-ID: | 201111220338.pAM3cZ200105@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> I've been helping out several customers recently who all seem to be
> wrestling with the same issue: wanting to update/refresh non-production
> databases from the latest corresponding prod version. Typically they
> have (fairly complex) scripts that at some point attempt to restore a
> dump into new database and then rename the to-be-retired db out of the
> way and rename the newly restored one to take over.
>
> In many cases such scripts would be simplified if a database could be
> renamed without requiring its connections terminated. I've been asked
> several times if this could be added... so I've caved in a done a patch
> that allows this.
>
> The default behavior is unchanged - it is required to specify an
> additional trailing FORCE keyword to elicit the more brutal behavior.
> Note that existing connections to the renamed database are unaffected,
> but obviously SELECT current_database() returns the new name (in the
> next transaction).
Uh, it isn't save to copy a database when someone else is connected.
How does this address that issue?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-22 03:41:27 | Re: Rename a database that has connections |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-11-22 03:17:45 | Re: strange nbtree corruption report |