From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removing postgres -f command line option |
Date: | 2011-11-22 02:41:53 |
Message-ID: | 201111220241.pAM2frS21286@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I think it is hard to argue that such a user-visible flag is
> > reasonable, even if it helps backend developers avoid some keystrokes.
>
> > I think flags used only by backend developers should be things that can
> > _only_ be done with flags.
>
> Huh? By that argument, we should remove every single postmaster command
> line switch except "-c var=value", because all the other ones are
> shorthands for that --- Peter went to some lengths awhile ago to make
> that true.
I was talking about developer-use-only flags.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2011-11-22 03:13:13 | Rename a database that has connections |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-22 02:32:44 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid marking buffer dirty when VACUUM has no work to do. |