| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unreproducible bug in snapshot import code |
| Date: | 2011-10-28 14:11:09 |
| Message-ID: | 201110281411.p9SEB9F04063@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> > > I have tried reproducing the bug starting from 1 and 2 transactions
> > before
> > > the one shown in snippet, and I used tab-completion to get the same
> > > screen-output as termonal1.txt and yet it's not reproducible.
> >
> > I could reproduce it when I typed TAB just after typing "set" in "set
> > transaction snapshot".
> > As Tom and Alvaro pointed out, the tab-completion issues a query and which
> > prevents the "set transaction snapshot" command.
> >
>
> Great! That settles it then. Reproducible, but not a bug.
Yes, it is only tabs that query the database for completion that cause
this. Should this be documented somehow? (No idea how.)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-10-28 14:14:49 | Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-10-28 14:09:29 | Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped |