Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH
Date: 2011-10-15 13:58:33
Message-ID: 201110151358.p9FDwXe27641@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2011-10-13 at 11:31 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The attached patch changes this to use the _major_ version number for
> > psql rc files. Does this have to be backward-compatible? Should I
> > check for minor and major matches? That is going to be confusing to
> > document.
>
> Contrary to what the subject suggests, I think the main reason people
> wanted this feature was to be able to set the linestyle to unicode
> without getting a warning from older releases about unknown linestyle or
> something. But in a few years, they'll have to
> maintain .psqlrc-9.2, .psqlrc-9.3, .psqlrc-9.4, etc. That doesn't sound
> like a useful long-term solution either.

Well, frankly, I think the fact we were matching on minor version number
was even worse. This is slightly better. I guess they could use
symlinks to keep a config file for multiple versions, but I agree it
isn't a long-term great solution.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-15 13:58:50 Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-10-15 13:41:03 Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH