| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH |
| Date: | 2011-10-15 00:26:38 |
| Message-ID: | 201110150026.p9F0Qcu17015@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Oops, I see a problem. Right now, our first major release has no zero,
> > e.g. 9.2, while our minors have a third digit, 9.2.5. The problem is
> > that with this patch it is confusing to have a psql config file that
> > matches 9.2.0, but not 9.2.5, because you can't write 9.2.0.
>
> Uh, this seems like nonsense. We've been labeling major releases with
> a dot-zero for some time, and that's embedded in process now (cf
> version_stamp.pl) to the point that we're unlikely to forget to do so.
Ah, I see now. 9.1 has:
#define PG_VERSION "9.1.0"
I rarely see the non-dev trees. No problem then.
Patch applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jun Ishiduka | 2011-10-15 01:35:45 | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-14 23:08:16 | Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO |