From: | "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Cornett <adam(dot)cornett(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Good, Thomas" <TGood(at)svwsjmc(dot)org>, "pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Tripping over (my own) stupidity - VARCHAR declaration minus specificity |
Date: | 2011-10-14 18:09:19 |
Message-ID: | 20111014180919.GY10975@staff-mud-56-27.rice.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:51:04PM -0400, Adam Cornett wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Good, Thomas <TGood(at)svwsjmc(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > I created a table in a hurry and forgot to specify the max capacity for a
> > varchar() data type.
> > Can it be said what the max would be in a case like this (just curious)?
> >
> > thanks much
> >
>
> According to
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-character.html,
> "If character varying is used without length specifier, the type accepts
> strings of any size. The latter is a PostgreSQL extension."
>
> -Adam Cornett
And according to the documentation, the maximum size of a varchar is
1GB.
Regards,
Ken
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Cornett | 2011-10-14 18:24:13 | Re: Tripping over (my own) stupidity - VARCHAR declaration minus specificity |
Previous Message | Adam Cornett | 2011-10-14 17:51:04 | Re: Tripping over (my own) stupidity - VARCHAR declaration minus specificity |