Re: patch: move dumpUserConfig call in dumpRoles function of pg_dumpall.c

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch: move dumpUserConfig call in dumpRoles function of pg_dumpall.c
Date: 2011-10-13 07:20:26
Message-ID: 20111013072026.GB16375@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:27:51PM -0400, Phil Sorber wrote:
> My proposal would be to table the discussion about the 'ALTER DATABASE
> SET ROLE' case because there seems to be a bit of a philosophical
> debate behind this that needs to be sorted out first.

Note: "to table the discussion" means opposite things in American and
British english. I think the rest of the sentence makes it clear what
you mean though :).

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he does
> not attach much importance to his own thoughts.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jun Ishiduka 2011-10-13 09:39:09 Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Previous Message Brar Piening 2011-10-13 05:29:44 Re: Commitfest app not exporting "moved to another commitfest" to rss