From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation |
Date: | 2011-10-11 21:45:44 |
Message-ID: | 201110112145.p9BLjiL15445@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > That experience has taught me that backwards compatibility, while very
> > important in a lot of cases, has the potential to do just as much harm
> > if overdone.
>
> Agreed. Does my suggestion represent overdoing it? I ask for balance,
> not an extreme.
Well, balance is looking at what everyone else in the group is
suggesting, and realizing you might not have all the answers, and
listening. As far as I can see, you are the _only_ one who thinks it
needs an option. In that light, your suggestion seems extreme, not
balanced.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-10-11 22:07:04 | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |
Previous Message | Steve Singer | 2011-10-11 21:44:34 | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |