From: | Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com |
Cc: | masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
Date: | 2011-10-11 10:15:54 |
Message-ID: | 201110111017.p9BAHRNu021817@ccmds32.silk.ntts.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I can't see a reason why we would use a new WAL record for this,
> rather than modify the XLOG_PARAMETER_CHANGE record type which was
> created for a very similar reason.
> The code would be much simpler if we just extend
> XLOG_PARAMETER_CHANGE, so please can we do that?
Sure.
> The log message "full_page_writes on master is set invalid more than
> once during online backup" should read "at least once" rather than
> "more than once".
Yes.
> lastFpwDisabledLSN needs to be initialized.
I think it don't need because all values in XLogCtl is initialized 0.
> Is there a reason to add lastFpwDisabledLSN onto the Control file? If
> we log parameters after every checkpoint then we'll know the values
> when we startup. If we keep logging parameters this way we'll end up
> with a very awkward and large control file. I would personally prefer
> to avoid that, but that thought could go either way. Let's see if
> anyone else thinks that also.
Yes. I add to CreateCheckPoint().
Image:
CreateCheckPoint()
{
if (!shutdown && XLogStandbyInfoActive())
{
LogStandbySnapshot()
XLogReportParameters()
}
}
XLogReportParameters()
{
if (fpw == 'off' || ... )
XLOGINSERT()
}
However, it'll write XLOG_PARAMETER_CHANGE every checkpoints when FPW is 'off'.
(It will increases the amount of WAL.)
Is it OK?
Regards.
--------------------------------------------
Jun Ishizuka
NTT Software Corporation
TEL:045-317-7018
E-Mail: ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp
--------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-10-11 10:36:48 | Re: index-only scans |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-10-11 08:40:26 | Proposal: casts row to array and array to row |