From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Raghavendra <raghavendra(dot)rao(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: In which case PG_VERSION file updates ? |
Date: | 2011-10-07 14:05:11 |
Message-ID: | 201110071405.p97E5Bk21242@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Raghavendra
> <raghavendra(dot)rao(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks Adrian Klaver,
> > Provided link gives about the information of what PG_VERSION file, which am
> > aware of:)
> > In my observation, all the object related OID's, _fsm, _vm files under
> > $PGDATA/base/database-oid/ directory will change as per the changes made to
> > the database, whereas PG_VERSION file never changes. Because its the file
> > tells on which version of Binary the Data directory is built upon.
> > So, my question is, Is there any case, where PG_VERSION file updates with
> > any of the utility process or
> > PG_VERSION file never been touched by PG-Instance ?
>
> If you run pg_upgrade I'd expect that to change it.
Yes, PG_VERSION is one of the files that is set via initdb on the new
cluster, and that file is not copied over from the old cluster (only
heap/index user files).
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cédric Villemain | 2011-10-07 14:23:48 | Re: Never-idle autovacuum, and does (auto)vacuuming fill the OS cache ? |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-10-07 10:56:16 | Re: Can we use sqlcode in functions of plpgsql |