| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Mr(dot) Aaron W(dot) Swenson" <titanofold(at)gentoo(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories |
| Date: | 2011-10-04 13:42:42 |
| Message-ID: | 201110041342.p94DggW18820@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On m?n, 2011-10-03 at 18:44 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Agreed. You could argue that pg_ctl 9.1 is much better than anything
> > anyone would be able to craft in a script.
>
> And what facts support that argument?
Because pg_ctl 9.1 will read postmaster.pid and find the port number,
socket location, and listen host for wait mode --- I doubt someone would
do that work in a script.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2011-10-04 14:28:37 | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-10-04 13:15:11 | Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp |