Re: RAID Controller (HP P400) beat by SW-RAID?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Anthony Presley <anthony(at)resolution(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RAID Controller (HP P400) beat by SW-RAID?
Date: 2011-09-11 22:51:21
Message-ID: 20110911225121.GM12765@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

* Anthony Presley (anthony(at)resolution(dot)com) wrote:
> I was really hoping that with hardware RAID that something would be faster
> (loading times, queries, etc...). What am I doing wrong?

ext3 and ext4 do NOT perform identically out of the box.. You might be
running into the write barriers problem here with ext4 forcing the RAID
controllers to push commits all the way to the hard drive before
returning (thus making the BBWC next to useless).

You might try w/ ext3 on the new system instead.

Also, the p800's are definitely better than the p400's, but I don't know
that it's the controller that's really the issue here..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2011-09-11 23:01:35 Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB
Previous Message Hany ABOU-GHOURY 2011-09-11 22:48:55 Re: Databases optimization