| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers |
| Date: | 2011-09-07 13:24:27 |
| Message-ID: | 201109071324.p87DORC05280@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs |
Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> >> How about a doc tweak like the attached?
> >
> > Perfect. ?Applied to 9.0, 9.1, and head. ?Thanks. ?Sorry for the delay.
>
> Err, as Tom's first comment in this thread explains, Pavel and I were
> both wrong: the variables in question are indeed NULL, not undefined.
> I think the docs were fine the way they were.
OK, reverted. I did not see Tom's comment.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-09-07 13:40:19 | Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers |
| Previous Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2011-09-07 13:21:06 | Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-09-07 13:40:19 | Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers |
| Previous Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2011-09-07 13:21:06 | Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers |