Re: Migration page is out of date

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Migration page is out of date
Date: 2011-09-06 16:40:54
Message-ID: 201109061640.p86Ges103842@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/migration.html
> >
> > This page:
> >
> > a) has insufficient coverage of pg_upgrade
> > b) ignores parallel pg_restore
> > c) piping pg_dump is by no means always the fastest method
> >
> > I'll write up a new version later, just wanted to put this note on the
> > ML so that somebody would bug me before the end of 9.1 beta.
>
> Hey, you!

I am not sure if you were aware that I re-did the upgrade section of the
docs to clearly mention pg_upgrade and other issues:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/upgrading.html

I am not sure how to mention parallel pg_restore when pg_dumpall can't
be used in parallel restore mode.

Any suggested changes?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-09-07 02:54:39 Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-09-06 15:52:32 Re: about value storage