From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Building PDFs error: \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd |
Date: | 2011-09-05 16:50:24 |
Message-ID: | 201109051650.p85GoOu14781@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2011-01-28 at 12:11 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > In my build, the entire contrib manual is potentially interdependent,
> > because the sub-sections of Appendix F don't start new pages. This
> > seems bad. What is even more curious is that it looks like the function
> > "man pages" within the dblink section *do* get forced page breaks.
> > That is inconsistent to say the least. How much control do we have over
> > this type of formatting decision?
>
> There is a parameter that controls whether a references page starts on a
> new page. But that's it. It's not impossible to hack the stylesheet to
> add more page breaks, but that would affect the whole book, not just one
> particular chapter.
>
> With the promotion of the contrib stuff, perhaps they should each get
> their own chapter in a new part.
Is this a TODO? Did we ever decide on this?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-09-05 18:21:46 | Re: Couple document fixes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-09-05 15:56:03 | Re: 'literal' for numbers |