From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net> |
Cc: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem |
Date: | 2011-08-31 18:25:44 |
Message-ID: | 201108311825.p7VIPim14330@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
FYI, I am working with depesz on IM right now and will report back when
we have a cause of the bug. FYI, I was without electric power for 53
hours, which is why I am late in replying to this report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
daveg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 07:49:24PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 06:54:41PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> > vacuumdb: vacuuming of database "etsy_v2" failed: ERROR: could not access status of transaction 3429738606
> > DETAIL: Could not open file "pg_clog/0CC6": No such file or directory.
> >
> > Interestingly.
> >
> > In old dir there is pg_clog directory with files:
> > 0AC0 .. 0DAF (including 0CC6, size 262144)
> > but new pg_clog has only:
> > 0D2F .. 0DB0
> >
> > File content - nearly all files that exist in both places are the same, with exception of 2 newest ones in new datadir:
> > 3c5122f3e80851735c19522065a2d12a 0DAF
> > 8651fc2b9fa3d27cfb5b496165cead68 0DB0
> >
> > 0DB0 doesn't exist in old, and 0DAF has different md5sum: 7d48996c762d6a10f8eda88ae766c5dd
> >
> > one more thing. I did select count(*) from transactions and it worked.
> >
> > that's about it. I can probably copy over files from old datadir to new (in
> > pg_clog/), and will be happy to do it, but I'll wait for your call - retry with
> > copies files might destroy some evidence.
>
> I had this same thing happen this Saturday just past and my client had to
> restore the whole 2+ TB instance from the previous days pg_dumps.
> I had been thinking that perhaps I did something wrong in setting up or
> running the upgrade, but had not found it yet. Now that I see Hubert has
> the same problem it is starting to look like pg_upgrade can eat all your
> data.
>
> After running pg_upgrade apparently successfully and analyzeing all the
> tables we restarted the production workload and started getting errors:
>
> 2011-08-27 04:18:34.015 12337 c06 postgres ERROR: could not access status of transaction 2923961093
> 2011-08-27 04:18:34.015 12337 c06 postgres DETAIL: Could not open file "pg_clog/0AE4": No such file or directory.
> 2011-08-27 04:18:34.015 12337 c06 postgres STATEMENT: analyze public.b_pxx;
>
> On examination the pg_clog directory contained on two files timestamped
> after the startup of the new cluster with 9.0.4. Other hosts that upgraded
> successfully had numerous files in pg_clog dating back a few days. So it
> appears that all the clog files went missing during the upgrade somehow.
> a
> This happened upgrading from 8.4.7 to 9.0.4, with a brief session in between
> at 8.4.8. We have upgraded several hosts to 9.0.4 successfully previously.
>
> -dg
>
> --
> David Gould daveg(at)sonic(dot)net 510 536 1443 510 282 0869
> If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-08-31 18:35:53 | Re: Using a function in different schemas |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-31 18:10:51 | Re: regression between 8.4.8 and 8.4.2? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2011-08-31 18:38:32 | WIP: SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-31 18:12:58 | Re: limit in subquery causes poor selectivity estimation |