From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem |
Date: | 2011-08-29 16:54:41 |
Message-ID: | 20110829165441.GA28573@depesz.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 05:28:35PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:18:55AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > OK, this was very helpful. I found out that there is a bug in current
> > 9.0.X, 9.1.X, and HEAD that I introduced recently when I excluded temp
> > tables. (The bug is not in any released version of pg_upgrade.) The
> > attached, applied patches should fix it for you. I assume you are
> > running 9.0.X, and not 9.0.4.
>
> pg_upgrade worked. Now I'm doing reindex and later on vacuumdb -az.
vacuumdb failed. The fail looks very similar to the one I had on 9.0.4.
After long vacuum I got:
INFO: vacuuming "pg_toast.pg_toast_106668498"
vacuumdb: vacuuming of database "etsy_v2" failed: ERROR: could not access status of transaction 3429738606
DETAIL: Could not open file "pg_clog/0CC6": No such file or directory.
Unfortunately at the moment, I no longer have the old (8.3) setup, but I do
have the 9.0.X and will be happy to provide any info you might need to help me
debug/fix the problem.
Best regards,
depesz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-08-29 17:49:24 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem |
Previous Message | Martín Marqués | 2011-08-29 16:48:48 | Re: passing cursors from one PL function to another |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-08-29 16:58:19 | Re: limit in subquery causes poor selectivity estimation |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-08-29 16:53:51 | Re: spinlocks on HP-UX |