Re: Update with ORDER BY and LIMIT

From: Paul M Foster <paulf(at)quillandmouse(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update with ORDER BY and LIMIT
Date: 2011-08-09 01:58:13
Message-ID: 20110809015813.GF21240@quillandmouse.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 05:34:14PM -0400, David Johnston wrote:

> For whatever reason, the cust.lpmtamt and cust.lpmtdt are sometimes lacking
> values and shouldn't be. I want to update the customer table to update these
> values from the cashh table. I don't want to use an internal function. The
> PG version is 8.X.
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> No such version. All PostgreSQL released versions use the numbers 0-9 and
> periods only; no letters.

8.X in this context means "8 point something, but I can't recall which
something". Could be 8.2, 8.3 or 8.4. Thus, in effect, asking those
replying to restrict themselves to 8 series features, as opposed to 9
series features.

>
> The general form for an UPDATE is:
>
> UPDATE table
> SET field = table2.field
> FROM table2
> WHERE table.field = table2.field;
>
> SO:
>
> UPDATE customer
> SET lpmtdt = rcpt.rcptdt, lpmtamt = rcpt.rcptamt
> FROM (SELECT custno, rcptdt, rcptamt FROM cashh WHERE ... ORDER BY ... LIMIT
> 1) rcpt
> WHERE customer.custno = rcpt.custno AND customer.lptmdt IS NULL OR
> customer.lpmtamt IS NULL
>
> NOT TESTED
>

Works well enough as a starting point. Thanks.

Paul

--
Paul M. Foster
http://noferblatz.com
http://quillandmouse.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2011-08-09 02:01:35 Re: upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4
Previous Message David Johnston 2011-08-09 00:02:12 Re: upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4