Re: Implementing "thick"/"fat" databases

From: Peter Bex <Peter(dot)Bex(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Implementing "thick"/"fat" databases
Date: 2011-07-27 16:07:06
Message-ID: 20110727160706.GA20270@frohike.homeunix.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 04:35:45PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > I wonder which other languages have first class support for these areas of
> > Pg?
>
> While already supporting most if not all standard PG datatypes the
> psycopg2 interface lets you write in/out wrappers of arbitray
> complexity mapping PG <-> Python datatypes and insert them into
> the driver at runtime.

The same is true for the Chicken Scheme PostgreSQL egg.

Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl Nack 2011-07-27 16:18:14 Re: Implementing "thick"/"fat" databases
Previous Message Karl Nack 2011-07-27 15:27:53 Re: Implementing "thick"/"fat" databases