| From: | Peter Bex <Peter(dot)Bex(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Implementing "thick"/"fat" databases |
| Date: | 2011-07-27 16:07:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20110727160706.GA20270@frohike.homeunix.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 04:35:45PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > I wonder which other languages have first class support for these areas of
> > Pg?
>
> While already supporting most if not all standard PG datatypes the
> psycopg2 interface lets you write in/out wrappers of arbitray
> complexity mapping PG <-> Python datatypes and insert them into
> the driver at runtime.
The same is true for the Chicken Scheme PostgreSQL egg.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karl Nack | 2011-07-27 16:18:14 | Re: Implementing "thick"/"fat" databases |
| Previous Message | Karl Nack | 2011-07-27 15:27:53 | Re: Implementing "thick"/"fat" databases |