Re: Choosing primary key type: 64 or 52 bit primary keys?

From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Choosing primary key type: 64 or 52 bit primary keys?
Date: 2011-07-22 11:52:16
Message-ID: 201107221452.16369.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Στις Friday 22 July 2011 13:25:21 ο/η Achilleas Mantzios έγραψε:
> bigint by all means. floating point arithmetic is somewhat more bloated/fuzzy/straight forward than integer,
^^^^^^^^^^
oops sorry i mean "less straight forward"
> and even if postgresql was perfect regarding floating point comparisons, no one can claim
> the same for client languages. So define your PK as bigint.
>
> Στις Friday 22 July 2011 10:01:58 ο/η Antonio Vieiro έγραψε:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to use an integer number for my primary key. I need it to be
> > bigger than 32 bits.
> >
> > As far as I understand I have two options:
> >
> > a) use all the 64 bits of a 'bigint'
> > b) use the 52 mantissa bits of a 'double precision'
> >
> > My question is, which would be faster for indexing? I assume the
> > bigint wins here, right?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Antonio
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Achilleas Mantzios
>

--
Achilleas Mantzios

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-07-22 13:52:52 Re: Timestamp parsing with blanked time part
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2011-07-22 11:24:08 Re: Tracing in Postgres