From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Enhanced psql in core? |
Date: | 2011-07-11 01:34:27 |
Message-ID: | 20110711013427.GO32313@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> You can't *today*. But it's a very good question whether it wouldn't
> make more sense to solve these problems by extending DO rather than
> adding things into psql. Functionality in DO will be available to
> non-psql clients.
I don't think we're ever going to have DO able to do cross-database
things, or top-level transaction control, etc. Perhaps, some day, we'll
have a way to do that kind of thing in the back-end (I certainly hope
so, and Berkus had posted a lot of good thoughts about that not too long
ago), but even so, I think it'd be great to have some real scripting
capability in psql and I'm all for fixing the variable handling w/
a ":{var}" capability..
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | HarmeekSingh Bedi | 2011-07-11 01:35:37 | Re: Expression Pruning in postgress |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-07-11 01:26:44 | Re: Cascade replication |