From: | <gnuoytr(at)rcn(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Michael Nolan" <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Reid(dot)Thompson(at)ateb(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Contrib source |
Date: | 2011-06-30 16:48:57 |
Message-ID: | 201106301648.060004@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I just got wholly confused. Synaptic makes it appear that *contrib is a separate entity. And the source isn't in a src subdirectory, but in the contrib directory directly. If I built PG on a regular basis, I might remember all this.
The xTuple folks only support a few PG releases, and with a specific set of modules built in. So, off to build it again.
Robert
---- Original message ----
>Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:03:52 -0500
>From: Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>
>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Contrib source
>To: gnuoytr(at)rcn(dot)com
>Cc: Reid(dot)Thompson(at)ateb(dot)com,pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, <gnuoytr(at)rcn(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> D'oh! **I didn't recall that it was packaged
> together, but the contrib source isn't in src,
> where I looked. **Oh well.
>
> IIt's not a separate file, there should be a contrib
> subdirectory in the source code file.
>
> However, if you're using a packaged pre-built
> binary, you're pretty much at the mercy of the
> packager as to which contrib packages are built in
> (if any) or available separately.
>
> Using a pre-built binary and then building a contrib
> package from the source code might cause some
> problems, I've always just built everything from the
> source code. ****
> --
> Mike Nolan
> nolan(at)tssi(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-06-30 17:41:57 | Re: Contrib source |
Previous Message | Michael Nolan | 2011-06-30 16:03:52 | Re: Contrib source |