Re: An amusing MySQL weakness--not!

From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: An amusing MySQL weakness--not!
Date: 2011-06-27 07:12:50
Message-ID: 201106271012.51395.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Στις Sunday 26 June 2011 17:11:06 ο/η Vincent Veyron έγραψε:
> Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 00:05 -0700, Darren Duncan a crit :
> > Michael Nolan wrote:
>
> > Having real BOOLEAN is just one of the reasons I like Postgres the most.
> >
>
> Would you mind giving an example of where a boolean field would be a win
> over an integer one?
>
> I'm asking this because I frequently wonder what is best for my use; I
> normally query postgres via Perl modules, which don't care about boolean
> (the driver converts t/f to 0/1), but I like to tune my fields properly.

Alright, but in other enterprise-level platforms, like java, there is a boolean data type and a Boolean class wrapper.

>
>
> --
> Vincent Veyron
> http://marica.fr/
> Logiciel de gestion des sinistres et des contentieux pour le service juridique
>
>

--
Achilleas Mantzios

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2011-06-27 07:24:30 Re: Anyone using silent_mode?
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-06-27 07:06:52 Anyone using silent_mode?