Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes
Date: 2011-06-17 03:48:27
Message-ID: 201106170348.p5H3mRc19943@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Joshua Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > I should back up and explain that the reason for having usernames on
> > release feature items is not to give credit, but rather to assign
> > blame
> > later, in case the features cause problems. The submitter becomes the
> > default go-to person for problems with that item. Having a list of
> > reviewers does not serve that purpose, hence the slippery slope
> > comment.
>
> Well, unfortunately, while you and I might understand that, most of
> our community does not. And to the completely uninitiated, it sure
> looks like credit.

Agreed.

> All of this is becoming less of a problem as we update the contributor
> list regularly. If I can clean up the sponsors list as well, I think
> we'll hear less complaints.

Yep.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-06-17 04:58:37 Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes
Previous Message Joshua Berkus 2011-06-17 01:15:41 Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes