Re: Remove support for 'userlocks'?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Remove support for 'userlocks'?
Date: 2011-06-04 02:12:10
Message-ID: 201106040212.p542CAY15006@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 6/3/11 11:01 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > According to our documentation, 'userlocks' were removed in PG 8.2:
> >
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/runtime-config-developer.html
>
> I take it this doesn't trace advisory locks, and trace_locks does?
>
> If so, then by all means remove the code. I highly doubt anyone is
> using that option anyway ...

OK, that is something I will do for 9.2.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Chernow 2011-06-04 02:26:26 Re: Error in PQsetvalue
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-06-04 01:32:56 Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table