From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |
Date: | 2011-06-03 20:35:14 |
Message-ID: | 201106032035.p53KZEs20285@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > ?The number of people reading and replying to
> > emails on pgsql-bugs is already insufficient, perhaps because of the
> > (incorrect) perception that Tom does or will fix everything and no one
> > else needs to care. ?So anything that makes it harder for people to
> > follow along and participate is a non-starter IMV.
>
> Actually I think most of our bugs don't come in from pgsql-bugs. I
> think we want to add other bugs that come up from discussions on
> -hackers or -general which for whatever reason don't get immediately
> fixed.
Agreed. At that point the TODO list is no longer needed, perhaps. It
would be nice to have a system where we could categorize items, and add
"features" as well because the bug/feature distinction is often very
hard to make.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-06-03 20:36:30 | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-06-03 20:31:49 | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |