From: | Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz <postgresql3(at)numerixtechnology(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: trigger - dynamic WHERE clause |
Date: | 2011-05-30 23:20:26 |
Message-ID: | 20110531002026.2450580e@dick.coachhouse |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 30 May 2011 11:02:34 +0200
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> 2) I took from your blog entry
>> (http://okbob.blogspot.com/2008/06/execute-using-feature-in-postgresql-84.html)
>> that it is good practice to use EXECUTE USING.
>> Well, there's no danger of SQL injection as this particular DB runs
>> on an internal network. However, I am wondering whether EXECUTE
>> USING has a performance advantage?
>>
>
>You newer know where or who is attacker :)
>The performance is very similar now - the most slow part is generating
>of execution plan - not IO operations.
I have converted my generic trigger to use EXECUTE ... USING.
I need to convert all NEW values to a text array, retaining their
ordinal position.
avals(hstore(NEW)) doesn't seem to do that:
NEW: (5,name5,1000,,,2)
avals(hstore(NEW)): {5,name5,2,1000,NULL,NULL}
The best I can come up with is a JOIN with information_schema.columns.
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-05-30 23:20:44 | Re: Universal certificate for verify-full ssl connection |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-05-30 23:17:37 | Re: determine database and tables from deadlock |