Re: Do you recommend 8.4 or 9.0 for basic usage?

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do you recommend 8.4 or 9.0 for basic usage?
Date: 2011-05-23 15:03:47
Message-ID: 20110523150347.GA3342@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 12:32:48PM -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
> MauMau,
>
> > Could you give me your frank opinions about which of 8.4 or 9.0
> > you recommend to ISVs who embed PostgreSQL?

> As an ISV, though, you need to devise a plan whereby you can apply
> update releases to your client's machines if they are connected to
> the internet.

You need such a plan whether the clients' machines are connected to
the internet or not because access control[1] is not the only place
where your system may turn out to have bugs.

The only case where you will not need such a plan is for a disposable
system, i.e. where the decision tree for "there's a bug" has one
branch, which is "replace the system."

Cheers,
David.

[1] Please try hard not to confuse access control with security.
Access control has been, is, and will continue to be used by attackers
to damage systems from ones as small as chat rooms all the way up to
governments and economies.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-05-23 15:38:12 Re: SSI predicate locking on heap -- tuple or row?
Previous Message Vaibhav Kaushal 2011-05-23 14:51:38 Re: Foreign memory context read