From: | Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: disable seqscan |
Date: | 2011-05-23 12:14:03 |
Message-ID: | 20110523121403.GA31170@tux |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:31:04PM +0530, Nick Raj wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have build an index. When, i execute the query, it gives the result by
> > sequential scan, not by using my index.
>
> > For that, i have set enable_seqscan=off in postgresql.conf. But it still
> > going through sequential scan.
>
> It sounds like your index can't actually be used to satisfy your
> query. Without seeing the table definition, index definition, and
> query, however, it's pretty hard to give you a real answer.
... and the output produced by
explain analyse <insert your query>
Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chitra | 2011-05-23 12:16:10 | Postgre Client only Install on Linux- 8.4.7 |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2011-05-23 12:03:34 | Re: disable seqscan |